The key elements for E&M services are the history, exam, and medical decision making when using the 1995 or 1997 E&M guidelines. The examination criteria differ between the 1995 and 1997 E&M guidelines. This section describes the elements for each component in detail.
History - The HISTORY is composed of 4 elements:
1. Chief Complaint (CC) is usually a statement, in the patient's words, that gives the reason for the encounter.
2. History of Present Illness (HPI) is a chronological description of the patient’s present illness from onset of sign and/or symptom or from the previous encounter to present. The HPI is composed of eight (8) elements:
- Location (site of the problem/symptom)
- Quality (description or characteristics of the problem/symptom)
- Severity (intensity, degree or measure of the problem/symptom)
- Duration (length of time the problem/symptom has existed)
- Timing (regularity of occurrence, when the problem/symptom occurs)
- Context (events surrounding the occurrence of the problem/symptom)
- Modifying factors (factors attempted that may relieve/exacerbate/not impact the problem/symptom)
- Associated signs and symptoms (other problem/symptoms that accompany the main problem/symptom)
3. Review of Systems (ROS) is an inventory of body systems obtained through questions asked of patient regarding signs/symptoms which the patient may be experiencing or has experienced. The 'SYSTEMS' in the ROS include:
- Constitutional symptoms (e.g. fever, weight loss)
- Eyes
- Ears, nose, mouth and throat
- Cardiovascular
- Respiratory
- Gastrointestinal
- Genitourinary
- Musculoskeletal
- Integumentary (skin and/or breast)
- Neurologic
- Psychiatric
- Endocrine
- Hematologic/Lymphatic
- Allergic/Immunologic
There are 3 types of ROS.
- Problem pertinent - only the system related to the present illness is reviewed.
- Extended - 2 - 9 systems related to the illness are reviewed.
- Complete - 10 or more systems related to the illness are reviewed.
Complete ROS: For a complete ROS, at least 10 organ systems must be reviewed. Those systems with positive or pertinent negative responses must be individually documented. For the remaining systems, a notation indicating all other systems are negative is permissible. In the absence of such a notation, at least 10 systems must be individually documented.
If the ROS is completed by staff or on a form completed by the patient, it is likely that at least 10 systems would be individually addressed. However, if only nine systems are documented and there is no other indication that the other systems are negative, it would not qualify as a complete ROS.
4. Past, Family, and/or Social History (PFSH)
The PFSH consists of a review of three areas:
There are 2 types of PFSH:
- Pertinent - A review of the history directly related to the problem with at least one item from any of the 3 history areas documented.
- Complete:
- A. A review of all history areas must be documented for:
- - New Patients seen in the office, outpatient, domiciliary and home care settings
- - Hospital Observation Services
- - Initial Care in the Hospital
- - Consultations
- - Nursing Home comprehensive assessments
- B. A review of two of the three history areas must be documented for:
- - Established patients seen in the office, outpatient, domiciliary and home care settings
- - Emergency Department services
- - Nursing Home; subsequent visit
- A. A review of all history areas must be documented for:
There are four types of history: problem focused, expanded problem focused, detailed and comprehensive. The type of history is determined based on the information gathered for each of the four elements and the following table:
DETERMINING THE LEVEL HISTORY | ||||
Types | CC | HPI | ROS | PFSH |
---|---|---|---|---|
Problem Focused | Required | Brief 1-3 | N/A | N/A |
Expanded Problem Focused | Required | Brief 1-3 | Problem Pertinent 1 | N/A |
Detailed | Required | Extended 4 | Extended 2-9 | Pertinent 1/3 |
Comprehensive | Required | Extended 4 | Complete 10 | Complete 2/3 or 3/3 |
The ROS and/or PFSH may be recorded by ancillary staff or on a form completed by the patient. To document that the physician reviewed the information, there must be a notation by the physician supplementing or confirming the information recorded by others.
Exam - 1997 Guidelines
There are 2 categories of exam
- General Multi-System Exam
- Single Organ System Exam
The examining physician regardless of specialty may select either exam category. CMS has identified specific elements for each type of exam.
There are four types of exam:
- Problem Focused
- Expanded Problem Focused
- Detailed
- Comprehensive
Type | General Multi-System | Single System | |
---|---|---|---|
All Specialties | All Specialties except Eye & Psych |
Eye & Psych | |
Problem Focused | 1-5 elements | 1-5 elements | 1-5 elements |
Expanded Problem Focused | 6 elements | 6 elements | 6 elements |
Detailed | 12 elements or 2 bullets from at least 6 organ systems or body areas | 12 elements | 9 elements |
Comprehensive | 9 organ systems or body areas, all elements of exam performed with 2 elements for each documented | All elements performed with documentation of every element in a shaded box and at least one element from an unshaded box. | Same as single system |
Exam - 1995 Guidelines
As with the 1997 E&M guidelines, the 1995 guidelines also recognize four levels of exam. The following data identifies the body areas and/or organ systems and the number to be examined to qualify for each level.
System/Body Area | Elements of Exam |
---|---|
Organ Systems |
|
Body Areas |
|
System/Body Area | Number | Elements of Exam |
---|---|---|
Problem focused exam | 1 | Limited exam of affected body area or organ system |
Expanded problem focused exam | 2-5* | Limited exam of affected body area or organ system and other symptomatic or related organ system(s) |
Detailed exam | 6-7* | Extended exam of affected body area(s) and other symptomatic or related organ system(s) |
Comprehensive Exam | 8 | General multi-system exam (8 or more organ systems) or a complete exam of a single organ system |
*Based on the ambiguity of the CMS criteria for the exam component (i.e., CMS states 2-7 for both expanded problem-focused and detailed exams), your local Carrier guidelines may vary (e.g., CT state 2-4, for expanded problem-focused exam, and 5-7, for a detailed exam). Please check with your local Carrier to verify these specific guidelines are presently applicable in your state.
Medical Decision Making
There are four types of medical decision making.
- Straightforward
- Low
- Moderate
- High
The following table shows the progression of the elements required for each type of medical decision making. To qualify for a given type of decision making, two of the three elements in the table must be either met or exceeded.
Number of diagnoses or Management options | Amount and/or complexity of data to be reviewed | Risk of Complications and/or morbidity or mortality | Type of decision making |
---|---|---|---|
Minimal | Minimal or none | Minimal | Straightforward |
Limited | Limited | Low | Low Complexity |
Multiple | Moderate | Moderate | Moderate Complexity |
Extensive | Extensive | High | High Complexity |
The Table of Risk may be used to help determine whether the risk of significant complications, morbidity, and/or mortality is minimal, low, moderate, or high.